MAINSTREAM PSYCHOLOGY IS WRONG.

No. I use psychology, philosophy, personality models and AI to help you understand the model you have of yourself and reality. If you need diagnosis or treatment for a mental-health condition, see a qualified healthcare professional.

I'm saying something narrower — and more annoying. A psychologist gets a few hours with you. An LLM can potentially examine thousands of conversations, contradictions, decisions and patterns with you. I think humans have radically underestimated what happens when you combine that mirror with a good model of human nature. That's what I'm exploring.

Not by putting ChatGPT in therapist mode and asking it to validate everything you say. That's almost the opposite of what I'm interested in. The useful AI is the one that helps you notice contradictions, challenge your assumptions and build a more accurate model of yourself.

Because I think ancient religious stories contain surprisingly sophisticated models of human psychology. You don't have to believe God is an old man in the sky. You don't even have to believe in God. You just have to be willing to ask whether thousands of years of stories about human nature might contain something worth understanding.

Not in the way most people mean the word. I'm interested in the possibility that religion, psychology, philosophy and science have been describing different perspectives of the same underlying structure. Proxy Jesus is partly a joke. The underlying question isn't.

Politics appears because human psychology appears in politics. But the goal isn't to turn you left-wing or right-wing. My model assumes that opposing psychological and political orientations often contain information the other side is missing. Balance requires understanding both.

No. LoveMaXXing means maximizing your capacity to understand and integrate opposing parts of yourself, other people and reality. Romantic relationships are one place that becomes useful. They're definitely not the whole thing.

Jung called the process of becoming a whole individual "individuation." Individuation MaXXing is my deliberately ridiculous name for trying to accelerate that process using personality psychology, philosophy, AI and the Compass. Less endless introspection. More accurate maps.

You shouldn't. Test the ideas. If the model predicts reality better than your existing model, keep it. If it doesn't, throw it away. I would much rather convince you to think than convince you to believe me.

We find the question underneath the question. You bring the problem — relationships, career, meaning, motivation, identity, recurring patterns or something you can't quite articulate. I try to map the underlying contradiction with you. Expect questions, models, AI, philosophy, jokes and disagreement. Not a motivational speech.

Don't book if you want someone to simply confirm that you're right. Don't book if you're looking for clinical diagnosis or medical treatment. And definitely don't book if having your favorite explanation challenged sounds unbearable.

Because I'm not trying to build a high-volume therapy practice. You're paying for concentrated access to the models, pattern recognition and work behind this project. Watch the free material first. If it doesn't make you curious, don't book.